How do social protection and labour programmes contribute to social inclusion? : evidence from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India and Nepal : report / Babken Babajanian, Jessica Hagen-Zanker and Rebecca Homes.
Material type:
- 20527209
- Pamphlet HC417. B33 2014
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Pamphlet HC417.B33 2014 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 2 | Available | 3ACKU000365345 | |||
![]() |
Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Available | 3ACKU000365378 |
Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Pamphlet HC417.A959 1990 Report on donor information campaign trip / | Pamphlet HC417.A978 1990 Australian Relief Committee for Afghan refugees (ARC) : | Pamphlet HC417.A978 2011 Afghanistan : Uruzgan province : | Pamphlet HC417.B33 2014 How do social protection and labour programmes contribute to social inclusion? : evidence from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India and Nepal : | Pamphlet HC417.B335 2007 Background material : | Pamphlet HC417.B37 2016 Assessment of economic opportunities along the Afghan-Tajik border : | Pamphlet HC417.B466 2005 Reconstructing Afghanistan / |
Cover title.
“March 2014”.
“AREU research for a better Afghanistan”—cover page.
“Shaping policy for development”—cover page.
Includes bibliographical references.
Contents: Abbreviations—Executive summary—1. Introduction—2. Analytical framework and research approach-3. Research methodology—4. Background and country case studies—5. Research findings : to what extent do social protection and labour programmes contribute to social inclusion?—6. Conclusion and policy implications—References.
Summary: “Discussions around the post-2015 development goals and the proposed ‘leave no-one behind’ principle have revived global interest in inequality and the role of social protection in promoting social inclusion. The growing body of evidence on rising inequality and persistent structural poverty has…”—(page iii).
English