000 | 02027nam a2200301Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c16323 _d16323 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190522124012.0 | ||
008 | 120912s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
040 | _cACKU | ||
041 | _a124 | ||
043 | _aa-af--- | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aPamphlet HN670.6. _bZ9. _cG388 1996 |
100 | 1 | _aGautron, Brigitte. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aReport on a mid-term evaluation / _cBrigitte Gautron, Allam Jarrar. |
260 |
_aPeshawar : _bUnited Nations Office for Project Services ; _bComprehensive Disabled Afghans’ Project , _c1996. |
||
300 |
_a52, 8 pages, [8] unnumbered pages ; _c30 cm. |
||
500 | _aCover title. Spiral bound. “(June/July 1996)”—cover page. “United Nations Office for Project Services ; Comprehensive Disabled Afghans’ Project”—at head of title. | ||
504 | _6Includes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | _aContents: Acknowledgements—Abbreviations—Executive summary—Part 1 : evaluation report—1. Introduction—2. Methodology of the evaluation—3. Effectiveness—4. Efficiency—5. Impact—6. Gender policy—7. Management—8. Training—9. Sustainability—10. Coherence—Part 2 : formulation report. | ||
520 | _aSummary: “The second part of the evaluation was organized through a participatory approach, to involve CDAP managers from the regional and central level in the evaluation process. This methodology helped to train CDAP managers in developing a self-evaluation process and also helped to get a more comprehensive view of the programme by creating a larger evaluation team, thus undertaking more interviews and covering more areas of implementation. The evaluation was felt as an important learning process by CDAP…”—(page 4). | ||
546 | _a124 | ||
650 | 0 | _aNon-governmental organizations – Afghanistan. | |
650 | 0 | _aRural development – Afghanistan. | |
650 | 0 | _aHumanitarian assistance – Afghanistan. | |
650 | 0 | _aCommunity development – Afghanistan. | |
650 | 0 | _aEconomic assistance – Afghanistan. | |
942 |
_2lcc _cMON |